Wednesday, June 24, 2009

The Gay Leap Forward - Shanghai holds China's first Pride event




From June 7th - June 13th 2009, Shanghai was host to China's first ever gay pride! From what I saw, this historical event was truly a wholesome experience for everyone involved - local or expat, straight or gay, young or old - it really didn't matter - this ShanghaiPride really touched the lives of many, and well it was just good fun! I heard a lot of stories about people bringing their parents or children as part of their coming out - and I would be lying if I said it didn't bring just a little tear to my eyes.

I know the organizers were run down to near exhaustion by the end of the week, after months and months of planning - and well I have to give it to them for working so hard to make this happen.

Here are some news links which provided coverage of the event:

CHINA DAILY
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2009-06/16/content_8286837.htm
http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2009-06/10/content_8266057.htm


NPR
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=105405434

NEW YORK TIMES
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/15/world/asia/15shanghai.html?ref=world

NEWSWEEK
http://www.newsweek.com/id/201981?from=rss

BBC
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8083672.stm
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/8093695.stm

REUTERS
http://www.reuters.com/article/lifestyleMolt/idUSTRE55C1UB20090613

THE ECONOMIST
http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13877186

ASSOCIATED PRESS
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hfoyK2CCVC2uH7RnX_ujwFroQUigD98T76PO2

THE ADVOCATE
http://www.advocate.com/news_detail_ektid89317.asp

LE MONDE
http://www.lemonde.fr/asie-pacifique/portfolio/2009/06/12/une-premiere-gay-pride-organisee-en-toute-discretion-en-chine_1205397_3216.html

Monday, June 15, 2009

Piercing the Corporate Veil: Shareholder and Director Liability in China

I. Introduction
The corporate law doctrine ‘Piercing the Corporate Veil’ refers to a longstanding common law concept in which a corporate shareholder or director is held responsible for the liabilities or debts of a corporation in excess of their capital contributions; notwithstanding the general principal - that corporate shareholders and directors are immune from contract or tort liability when acting under the auspice of a corporation.

Under the PRC Company Law (effective January 1, 2006) and related judicial opinions issued thereafter, there are several instances where PRC courts will find it necessary to look beyond the ‘legal fiction’ of a corporate person or entity and lift the corporate veil - to hold owners and those who run group companies jointly and severally liable for the debts of a company.

In the current economic climate as companies face restructuring, bankruptcies and forced closures, the issue of piercing the corporate veil has become more relevant. Those in charge must ensure that they do not abuse the independent legal status of their invested companies nor use their limited liability status to evade payment of debts. Private equity and venture capital firms especially risk exposing their entire funds to liability, and foreign investors who operate in China by way of numerous subsidiaries should be especially cautious so as not to expose the parent corporation to liability.

Examined below are the main features of the PRC’s application of the corporate veil doctrine and some recommendations for best practices.

II. What are the PRC Courts’ justifications for piercing the corporate veil?

Listed below are examples of improper formation and fraudulent and unfair corporate practices which will prompt piercing of the corporate veil in the PRC.

A. Invested companies that are deemed to lack independent legal person status.

(i) Failure to pay-up registered capital.
Even if a business license has been issued, if investors fail to in fact fully pay up their subscribed registered capital, the invested company will not be deemed to have independent legal person status.

(ii) Pre-maturely withdrawing registered capital.
Withdrawal of registered capital immediately after it has been paid-up is another circumstance where PRC courts will find that the registered capital has not in fact been paid-up and therefore the invested company does not have independent legal person status.

(iii) Round-tripping investments.
When capital that originated in the PRC exits and then re-enters the PRC as a foreign investment, it is referred to as round-tripping and is considered a ‘fake foreign investment’. In such cases, when the actual capital requirements as prescribed by the Ministry of Finance are not met, the foreign invested enterprise will be deemed as improperly formed and the ultimate investor whether on-shore or off-shore will be exposed to liability.

B. Parent company that meddles in the assets and operations of its invested company.

If there is a claim of ‘an abuse of the company’s independent legal status’, the burden of proof rests on the shareholders to prove that their assets are independent from the invested company’s assets.

Examples of such excessive meddling include:

 Where the parent company and its invested company enter into related party transactions which are detrimental to the investee.
 Where the parent company uses, claims, or does not otherwise differentiate assets of the invested company with its own.
 Where the management and control over an invested company is fictional and actual authority is exercised by the parent company.

III. Can China pursue foreign investors for liability in their home country?


In the absence of a bilateral or multilateral judicial assistance treaty, legislation of the country in question will dictate whether its courts will enforce a judgement rendered in China.

Common Law Jurisdictions. In common law jurisdictions such as Hong Kong, England, Canada, South Africa and the United States, a Chinese judgement may be generally enforced through case law. Creditors may seek enforcement through (a) breach of contract claim on an implied promise to pay, or otherwise as (b) a debt claim.

Civil Law Jurisdictions. In civil law jurisdictions such as France, Japan, Italy, Spain, Mexico, Switzerland and Belgium, national statutes constitute the exclusive basis for determining jurisdiction over Chinese judgements and prior judicial opinions play a slighter role in determining the outcome.

Test for Jurisdiction. In both civil and common law countries a relevant court’s jurisdiction over a particular defendant will depend on factors such as (i) domicile, (ii) notice, (ii) forum selection clause, (iii) location of assets (such as a bank account), and (iv) connection between the subject matter of the case and activities carried out by the defendant in the particular jurisdiction. Each country will have its own set of rules as to what constitutes a suitable basis to assert jurisdiction and generally the test is of compatibility between the Chinese court’s basis for assertion of jurisdiction when compared to its own laws.

IV. Best Practices
It is commonly understood that in the PRC maintaining a favourable image in the eyes of government authorities can ensure smooth operations of a business. Leaving pending legal issues unattended to is never recommended. In order to avoid joint and several liability for corporate debts, below are some examples of practices that should be strictly adhered to.

A. Follow proper dissolution and liquidation procedures.
If it is necessary to dissolve a company for any of the statutory reasons listed under the Company Law, it is important to, among others, notify the authorities and make a public announcement, form a liquidation committee to deal with pending matters, and pay off all outstanding taxes, debt and employee salaries and benefits.

B. If necessary, file for bankruptcy.
If after liquidation, the company’s property will not offset the outstanding debts, bankruptcy may be filed for by either the creditor or the company.

C. Keep accurate accounting records.
Although foreign corporations are obligated to report accounting and financial records according to the jurisdiction where they have been incorporated, with respect to invested companies in the PRC additional records should be kept according to standards set by PRC law and maintained in Chinese, with audits conducted by a PRC qualified firm.

D. Insulate liability through an offshore holding company.
To prevent the jurisdictional reach of China’s courts, if possible off-shore holding companies should be used to insulate the company from exposure of its entire asset base, because any further piercing of the corporate veil will be determined by the jurisdiction where the holding company is incorporated.

**and remember this is not legal advice!

Monday, June 1, 2009

Don't Forget Employer's Duties When Drafting Non-Compete Clauses

A Beijing Court recently rejected an employer’s claim for RMB 300,000 for a former employee's breach of a non-compete agreement.


Employer and Employee signed a Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreement, which basically stipulated that during the term of the labour employment and the effective period thereafter, Employee should not hold a part-time job or otherwise affiliate itself with a competitor or lure employees or customers away from employer (pretty general terms). The agreement did not however mention the Employees ‘rights’ or otherwise the Employer’s ‘duties’ with respect to the above obligation to not compete. Employee eventually left the position, and Employer paid Employee the non-compete compensation; but then appealed to the Beijing Arbitration Committee for the RMB 300,000 for the alleged breach. The appeal was rejected and the Employer brought the case to court.

The Court held....
In a Confidentiality and Non-Compete Agreement “both parties should be entitled to equal rights and responsibilities”. Since the agreement only stated the Employees responsibilities and failed to state the rights to which Employee is entitled to for compliance with its obligations, the contents of the agreement were deemed to be unfair and unbinding on the Employee. (Even though the Employer did infact remit the non-compete compensation)

Another example of how careful drafting can save the day.
* This is not legal advice

Wednesday, May 20, 2009

Social Media and Legal Booboos

Twitter, Facebook, Myspace, YouTube, are among the list of many Web 2.0 social media technologies that individuals and companies are increasingly using to engage with each other and with the public at large. Even the president is using it! http://twitter.com/BarackObama. And my dog.

The benefits of such mediums range far and wide, from creating collaborative and open platforms for the transfer of ideas, the fostering of common interests, tending to customer complaints, the rapid dissemination of information, and engaging employees and stakeholders of all kinds. However, in situations like the Domino Pizza Case, where a video portraying two employees doing some very bad things while on the job was posted on YouTube and received almost 1 million hits, its very clear that a number of legal implications can arise.

Some legal areas to watch out for that instantly come to mind include:
Tort – defamation, harassment, vicarious company liability.
IP – copyright and trademark issues.
Privacy – of employees, clients, trade secrets, other privileged information.


A clear set of rules and guidelines with respect to use of Social Media Technologies should be an indispensable part of your employee manual, which should already be an indispensable part of your employment plan (check out my earlier post on Working Guide on China's Labor Contract Law). All employees should be trained in Web 2.0 etiquette; the systems constantly audited; and most importantly make them sign acknowledgment forms.

For a good example of how to responsibly involve your employees in the world of Web 2.0, check out IBM’s Social Computing Guidelines

**And remember, nothing contained in this blog is legal advice

Monday, May 11, 2009

FDI China - Highlights of the 2009 Regulatory Framework

I. Laws and Regulations to Watch For in 2009

§ Foreign Investment Directory for the Middle and Western Regions (effective January 1, 2009)
- Incentives and preferential treatment with respect to taxes, interest on loans, and reduced rent on industrial use purpose land will be individually determined by each autonomous region, province and municipality.

- Foreign investment is encouraged in areas of environmental protection, agriculture, infrastructure and upgrades in industrial technology.

§ Greater Tax Rebates on Exports (effective January 1, 2009)
- Higher rebates on 533 high-tech products and machines.

§ Supplementary Provisions to the Measures for the Administration of Foreign Investment in the Commercial Sector (IV) (effective February 5, 2009)

- The purpose of these measures are to encourage “service providers” (as defined by CEPA) from Hong Kong and Macau to establish commercial enterprises in mainland China by way of allowing formation of WOFEs if such service provider (i) has established over 30 shops in mainland China, and (ii) deals in goods commodities such as medicine, fertilizers, pesticides, sugar, cotton, etc., - which are sold under different brands from different suppliers.

§ Measures for the Administration of Overseas Investment (effective May 1, 2009)

- Applying to both greenfield and M&A investments, these measures support outbound Chinese investments and include an overall simplification of approval procedures. The greatest impact will be in cases of small investments (i.e., under US$ 10 million) where approval power will vest in provincial level MOFCOM offices, and approvals can be expected within three (3) business days of filing.

§ Food Safety Law and its Implementation Rules (effective June 1, 2009)

- The highlights of this new law which will supersede the existing China Food Sanitation Law include (i) an improved monitoring and supervision system which will include the departments of Heath, Quality Supervision and Industry and Commerce and Agriculture, (ii) introduction of provincial level safety commissions, (iii) national level food safety standards, (iv) cancellation of exemptions from inspections, (v) articulation of food recall procedures (vi) harsh penalties for offenders with the possibility of criminal sanctions for severe cases.

§ Patent Law Amendment (effective October 1, 2009)

Some Highlights of the law include:

- Required Identification of Genetic Information – The amendments in the Patent Law along with the amendments in the Genetic Resource Law aim to protect the source of genetic material (namely China’s resources) by requiring patent applications to identify the heredity or source of genetic resources (i.e., animal, microbial, or plant). Protection of genetic information will only be granted provided the inventor reveals the source of genetic information to the Intellectual Property Bureau, and an explanation will have to be given in cases where the source or heredity cannot be identified.

- Compulsory Licenses for Patented Pharmaceuticals – Such licenses will be granted by the State Council, to manufacturers of medicines for export, which are already protected by Chinese patents, in cases where there is a strong public interest such as (i) where countries have entered into relevant treaties with China, or (ii) where the designated country of export is unable to produce such pharmaceuticals. This rule may undermine innovation and inventiveness.

- Increased Penalties – A patent holder may now claim for reasonable expenses incurred for stopping an infringement, and the maximum statutory damages for infringements have been increased to RMB 1 million.

- Implementation of an Absolute Novelty/Inventiveness Standard – Prior disclosure of any kind anywhere in the world (e.g. public use) may be cited as prior art against the (a) inventiveness or novelty of a utility patent application, or (b) novelty of a design patent. Design patents are also required to be substantially different from prior designs and from designs which are combinations of existing patents.

- Use of Patented Pharmaceuticals/Medical Equipment in Clinical Trials – Importation, production, and use of patented pharmaceuticals and medical equipment will be exempted from patent infringement if such uses are for administrative approval purposes.

- First Filing Requirement Replaced with National Security Review – The often circumvented first filing requirement is now replaced with the requirement that if one ever desires to secure a patent in China, before filing a patent in any country, a national security review must first be conducted by the State Intellectual Property Office of China (which may take 2 to 4 months), the details of which will be set forth in the expected Implementing Regulations of the Patent Law.




Highlights from 2008

I. Favoring Real Estate Investors


§ Since 2006, the Chinese government took regulatory action to cool down foreign investment in the overheated property market in China. However, its approach to foreign investment in the real estate sector shifted radically by the end of 2008 in response to the financial crisis. Some highlights include:

- Uniform Real Estate Tax - Starting January 1, 2009 uniform real estate tax is applicable to foreign and domestic real estate investors under the Provisional Regulations on Real Estate Tax of the PRC.

- Beijing Relaxes Rules for Foreign Purchasers for One Year – In the 2009 calendar year, foreigners may purchase property in Beijing without having to meet the one year residency requirement and the use purpose of the property will not be limited to self-use.

- Shanghai Allows for Foreign Currency Deposit Accounts for Land Payments - Foreign investors without any existing PRC establishments may open foreign currency deposit accounts for the purpose of paying land security deposits, allowing them to actively participate in land bidding.

- Filings Reviewed by Provincial Authorities – Under MOFCOM’s Notice 23, from June 18, 2008, review of filings on foreign investment projects have been delegated to its provincial level authorities, which indicates that the approval process should speed up.

II. Favouring Domestic Growth

§ Policy has shifted from favouring export oriented businesses to focusing on quality investments geared toward domestic led growth. This shift can be attributed to directives of the 11th 5 year plan on the Utilization of Foreign Investment.

§ Incentives under the 11th 5 year plan: as provided for in the 2007 Catalogue of Foreign Investment and the 2008 Catalogue of Foreign Investment in the Central and Western Regions

- Greatly expanded list of encouraged industries.
- Tax incentives for investment in Central and Western regions.

§ Prohibitions under the 11th 5 year plan:
- Solely export oriented projects.

- Projects listed in the 2005 Catalogue of Industrial Restructuring: such as those which waste electricity or raw materials; or those which pollute excessively or depend on outdated technology.

- Projects which focus on low value added consumer goods (toys, clothing, etc.), with low investment, use of low technology, and high employment of unskilled labour.

III. Favoring Establishment of Multinational Regional Headquarters in Shanghai

The Provisions of Shanghai Municipality on Encouraging the Establishment of Regional Headquarters by Multinational Corporations (effective on July 7, 2008)

Circular on the Implementation of Regulations on the Establishment of Multinational Headquarters in Shanghai, No. 28, Hufufa (effective November 15, 2008)

§ Major incentives include:
- Rental incentives of between RMB 500,000 – RMB 1,000,000 on leases with an area of more than 1,000 square meters and a minimum of a 3 year term.

- One time grant of (i) RMB 5 million for Management Companies whose annual turnover exceeds RMB 50 million; or (ii) RMB 10 million for Holding Companies whose annual turnover exceeds RMB 100 million.

- Other incentives include, (a) lower threshold of accumulated paid in capital, (b) broader permitted scope of business services, (c) relaxed rules on visas, work permits, and foreign employment certificates, and (d) simplified foreign currency conversions, and customs clearance and quarantines procedures for qualified bonded logistics and distribution centers.

Wednesday, April 29, 2009

Working Guide on China's Labor Contract Law**

Introduction



In the People’s Republic of China (“China” or “PRC”), employment related matters are governed by a multitude of laws which include:


· Trade Union Law of the PRC (1994);
· Regulations on Labour Management in Foreign Investment Enterprises (1994);
· Labour Law of the PRC (amended 1995);
· Company Law of the PRC (amended 2006);
· Law of the PRC on the Mediation and Arbitration of Employment Disputes (effective May 1, 2008); and
· Various municipal and local regulations, promulgated in accordance with the Labour Law of the PRC (together the “Existing Law”).

The Existing Law has most recently been supplemented and clarified by the Labour Contract Law of the PRC (effective January 1, 2008) and the Implementing Regulations on the Labour Contract Law of the PRC released on September 18, 2008, and taking effect that day (together the “LCL”). The LCL codifies widely accepted practices rooted in policies of the Ministry of Labour and Social Security (“MOL”) and was also promulgated in response to rampant worker abuse (e.g. dangerous conditions, long hours, etc.) and a further attempt to bring China’s employment laws more in line with other developed nations. Highlights of the LCL include a new private right of action for workers, limitations on probationary periods, a section devoted entirely to staffing firms, and clarification on compensation under various circumstances. Since the LCL went into effect, labour disputes have increased throughout the nation by well over 100%. Nanjing’s cases alone went up 231% in this past year. Below is a guideline to interpret the LCL.

I. Preliminary Measures Employers Must Take to be In Line with the LCL
Caveat - unlike the Existing Law where an actual contract was required to create an employment relationship, under the LCL if any money exchanges hands or an employee begins work, an employment relationship is created.

A. Labour Term and Required Provisions of a Labour Contract
The LCL, like most other employment laws divides employment contracts into three types: (i) fixed term – with an agreed end date; (ii) open-ended – no stipulated expiry date; and (iii) contract/ project based – terminates on completion of a certain job. After negotiation, an employer and employee must sign (or seal) a contract in at least two originals of which each party will hold one. An employment contract shall at minimum specify the following:


(a) name, address and legal contact of the employer;
(b) name, address and ID number of employee;
(c) term of contract;
(d) job description and site location;
(e) working hours, rest, holidays;
(f) compensation (per month or per annum);
(g) allocation to the 5 social insurance funds (pension, medical, maternity, accident, and unemployment insurances)[1];
(h) working conditions and protection against occupational hazards; and
(i) others stipulated by PRC law.

Agreements for “Part-time Labour”, in which the employee works no more than 4 hours a day and no more than 24 hours in a week for the same employer, may be concluded orally – and such employee must be compensated every 15 days (or less). Either party may terminate a part-time labour arrangement with notice at anytime, and no severance pay is necessary.

ü Note: labour contracts must be written in Chinese, but may be accompanied by any language translations. In case of discrepancies between the language versions, the Chinese version will prevail.


ü Note: an employer may not collect or retain any collateral from the employee (i.e. ID card or personal property etc.).

B. Timely Entry into Labour Contracts Required of Employers
Regardless of when a formal contract is issued, the “employment relationship” is considered established on the day the worker starts working for the employer (not when a contract is signed). Employers have a grace period of up to one (1) month from the establishment of an employment relationship in which to conclude an employment contract. Employers that fail to enter into employment contracts with their employees within the grace period will be responsible for double (2x) the month’s salary for each month thereafter without a formal contract (up to a year). If after a year, a labour contract is still not concluded, the employment relationship shall be considered open-ended (starting from the last day of that year) and the employer is required to immediately enter into a written contract.

C. Employee Handbook, the Single Most Valuable Tool in Avoiding a Labour Dispute
A written employee handbook or policy manual setting out thorough internal rules and regulations must be maintained and updated (even if employing only one worker) and should be incorporated into the employment contract by reference. Contents of such handbook may include, among others: code of conduct, conflicts resolution, use of company resources, confidentiality, grounds for termination, etc. The purpose is to be comprehensive nearly to the point of being exhaustive, because under the LCL, firing an employee is basically impossible without “cause” – and it is the employee handbook that will be referenced when defining cause.

D. Register of Employees and Reporting Requirements



A “Register of Employees” should be kept at all times for reference purposes and shall include particulars such as:
employees’ name, gender, ID number, registered permanent address, current residence, contract details, method and details of employment (whether directly hired or seconded), contract term, etc. An Employer can be fined between RMB 2,000 and RMB 20, 000 for failure to rectify a violation with respect to this rule.



In December 2006, the MOL issued guidelines requiring employers to within thirty (30) days of hiring new employees or renewing labour contracts, report the following information to the local labour bureau:
number of employees it is hiring; and
an updated Register of Employees.


Within seven (7) days of ending an employment relationship, employers must report:
§ The numbers of employees being terminated.


And according to the LCL, within fifteen (15) days of ending an employment relationship, employers must carry out procedures for transfer of the employee’s file and social insurance; disburse severance pay (as calculated below in Section II. D. (v)). And such terminated contracts shall be kept on file for two (2) years, for reference purposes.

II. Clarification of Specific Employment Contract Related Issues

A. Limitation on Probationary Periods
The limitations on probationary periods have the greatest impact on the rights of seasonal workers who under the Existing Law have been under arbitrary threat of being fired prior to termination of their short term contracts and generally were being underpaid. The LCL mandates that an employer may only set a probationary period once per employee regardless of how many times a contract is renewed. Also the wages of a probationary worker: (i) may not be less than 80% of the wage stipulated in the contract or less than 80% of the lowest wage level for the same job if no salary has been agreed; and (ii) may not be less than the minimum wage where the employer is located. The probationary periods should be set according to the following schedule:




3 months and < 1 year 1 month
> 1 year and < 3 years 2 months
3 years or open-ended 6 months
< 3 months or contract/project based No permissible probation period

B. Training Expenses and Employees’ Liquidated Damages for Prematurely Terminating
Employers that provide specially funded employee training (over and above that required by the State), may require that workers at minimum continue employment for a specified term or else subject them to payment of liquidated damages which: (i) shall be calculated based on the portion of training expenses allocable to the unperformed term of service; and (ii) in total shall not exceed the cost of the training expenses. These expenses may include, among others, travel, accommodation and food, trainer fees, and other direct expenses paid by the employer with respect to the training (evidenced by receipts).

C. Not all Employees can be bound by Non-compete and Confidentiality Obligations
Non-compete and confidentially obligations may only be imposed on senior management, senior technical personnel and employees that have access to business secrets of the employer, and can be no longer than two (2) years. ‘Senior management’ is clarified with reference to the Company Law and includes: managers (general, deputy, financial), board secretaries, and others specified in the company’s articles of association. Such covenant should be included in the employment contract or in a separate writing and must include the scope, territory, and terms of restrictions, along with stipulated monthly economic compensation throughout the duration of the covenant (which means compensation up to two years after termination of the employment relationship). The laws remain silent as to what is the minimally acceptable rate of economic compensation in this regard.

D. Employer’s Duty to Compensate under Various Circumstances




(i) No written contract –
If it is not clear what labour compensation was agreed, the rate shall be that specified in the enterprise’s or industry’s collective contract; if there is no collective contract, then fair pay should be given for the work, presumably based on market standards. See Section I. B. above, for penalties associated with no written contract.




(ii) Lay-offs –
See Severance Pay below and Section III. C. below for rules governing layoffs.




(iii) Overtime –
In China, standard working hours are: 8 hours a day/ 5 days per week with a maximum of 40 hrs per week, and 2 days of rest. These standards shall strictly be adhered to; meaning employers may not compel or used disguised manners to compel employers to work overtime. Statutes specify that such compensation shall be paid under condition that employers “arrange” for such overtime – in a plain sense, the employer must unambiguously ask a worker to perform overtime, although the rules defining “overtime” still remain vague in this regard. Any overtime work must be compensated according to the following schedule:



Work Day 150%
Day of Rest 200%
National Public Holidays[2] 300%
* based on actual salary

(iv) Unlawful Termination by Employer
If after an unlawful termination by the employer the employment relation is not resumed, due to impossibility or simply because the worker refuses, the employer is responsible for severance pay at twice (2x) the rate of severance pay (see below).

(v) Severance Pay
The calculation for severance pay = [number of years worked x average monthly wage (based on the last 12 months of employment)].



If however, the employee’s average monthly wage is greater than three times (3x) the average monthly wage in the relevant municipality, (i) the average monthly wage will be calculated based on (3x) the average municipal rate instead of the actual average, and (ii) the years of employment shall be capped at 12 years.




The circumstances giving rise to the employer’s duty to make severance payments are outlined in Article 46 of the LCL and the employer shall make such payments within fifteen (15) days of the date of termination. Interestingly, an Employer will be required to make a severance payment, if after the expiration of a fixed-term contract, an Employer does not offer to renew the contract on equal or better terms.

ü Note: for the purpose of calculating severance pay, any period less than 1 year shall be counted as 1 year.
ü Note: an employee is only entitled to half a month’s wages for service less than 6 months. Project based and seasonal workers are also entitled to severance pay.
ü Note: salary, bonuses, allowance and subsidies should be included in the figure.
ü Note: employers are not liable for additional severance pay if damages have already been paid to the employee for illegal termination of the contract.

(vi) Work Related Injury
For employees suffering work related injuries, in addition to severance pay (as calculated above), the employer shall also pay a medical and disability subsidy in one lump sum, according to the State’s regulations on work related injuries.

E. Dispute Resolution
Under the Mediation and Arbitration Law (May 1, 2008), the statute of limitations (“SOL”) for bringing a claim: (i) under an existing contract is 1 year after its termination or expiry; or (ii) if the contract has already expired, 1 year after the employee knew or should have known of an infringement. The following describes the process of a claim:
1. The dispute must be submitted to the local labour arbitration committee within the SOL;




2. Within 45 days after acceptance of the case, an award shall be rendered;




3. Arbitration decisions are final on the following issues: severance pay, salaries, medical fees for job related injuries and penalties (provided such amounts do not exceed 12 months minimum wage in the particular jurisdiction); and




4. Within fifteen (15) days of the arbitration decision either party may submit the dispute to the people’s court for a hearing (except for those issues listed as final above). Otherwise, the decision is final and binding.



Mediation is always the preferred method of dispute settlement as it requires much less strain on judicial resources. The Mediation and Arbitration Law stipulates that mediated settlements on severance pay, salaries, medical fees for job related injuries and penalties, can be entered into a people’s court for legal binding.

F. Other Points
Ø Employees may refuse to work in dangerous conditions.
Ø Existing contracts will survive mergers or acquisitions.
Ø Changes in name, legal representative, investor, person in charge etc., will not alter employment relationships, and Employers are required to honour those existing contracts.

III. Termination of Employment Contracts

A. What are conditions for indefinite employment?
Under the following situations an “open-ended contract” (as defined in Section A. I., above) should be concluded, thus creating an indefinite employment relationship:



1. At renewal, the employee has been working for the employer for a “consecutive period” of 10 years or more. When defining “consecutive” if an employee moves between employers due to corporate decisions, restructuring, or administrative decisions, the time with the old employer will be counted when determining the consecutive period. Also if after 10 years, as calculated above, an employee under the following circumstances wishes to enter into an open-ended contract, the employer is required to do so, if the employee:
· was exposed to dangerous conditions and not has had a health check prior to leaving, or is undergoing medical examination for a suspected occupation related disease/disorder.
· is recovering from a non-work related injury/illness.
· is pregnant or nursing.



2. If renewal occurs after the conclusion of two consecutive fixed-term contracts. Note: if an employee continues work after termination of a fixed-term contract and the employer has taken no such measures to end the employment relationship, a natural extension of the fixed-term contract will be presumed – and may, if it is the 3rd consecutive period, render the employee eligible for an open-ended contract.



3. If after a year a written labour contract is still not entered into (See Section I. B., above for details).
ü Note: open-ended contracts in the above situations can only be avoided if the employee explicitly states that he/she wishes to enter into a fixed-term contract.

B. Statutory Termination of Employment Contracts
An employment contract shall terminate automatically under the following circumstances:
· expiry of term;
· employee beings legally drawing his/her pension (i.e. retires);
· employee dies, or is declared missing by a court;
· employer is bankrupt, dissolved, has business license revoked, or is ordered to close; or
· others as mandated by law.




An exception to this rule can be found in Article 45 of the LCL which protects certain workers from statutory termination, such as those close to retirement, pregnant or nursing, or those that have not cleared health checks after being exposed to occupational hazards. How a bankrupt or dissolved company may actually handle such a situation has yet to be seen. Note the above circumstances will also protect a worker from termination by lay-off or termination with notice.
ü Note: the employer and employee may not contract for termination under any other circumstances other than the statutory grounds listed in Article 44.

C. Lay- Offs
A lay-off is qualified as a reduction of 20 or more employees or 10% or more of the company’s workforce. Provided notice is given to the labour union or all employees thirty (30) days in advance, under the LCL, the employer has quite some leeway in justifying a lay-off. In addition to the obvious situations of: restructuring, insolvency, serious business and operational difficulties; the LCL further permits lay-offs when a company changes its production, or adjusts or reforms its overall business and technology, or if circumstances render the company unable to honour its employment contracts.

In the case of a planned lay-off, the LCL protects employees who are the sole breadwinners, long-term employees, and those employees with open-term contracts. Additionally, if within six (6) months, the employee is in a position to rehire it shall give notice and priority to those laid-off.




D. Employer and Employee Initiated Termination of Employment Contracts




The LCL codifies 14 circumstances in which employers may terminate employment contracts; and 13 circumstances in which employees may do the same. Much of these provisions are a reiteration of the Existing Law with the following highlights:
· Employees still under probation are required to give 3 days’ prior written notice to the employer to terminate.
· Employees faced with dangerous conditions, illegal threats or work by force may immediately terminate. And along the lines of general contract principles, employers/employees who were threatened or illegally coerced into forming a contract may terminate such due to invalidity.
· Employers may terminate contracts with employees that establish employment elsewhere that materially interferes with employment with the employer.

IV. Will Labour Unions be Effective in Bargaining for their Employees?
The All China Federation of Trade Unions (“ACFTU”) is State controlled and China’s only authorized legal labour union. Workers may not be refused their right to unionize in China. A minimum of twenty-five signatures are needed to establish a branch. Once a union is formed the Employer is required to pay 2% of the payroll as union fees. Statutorily speaking, the LCL involves unions to a greater degree than the Existing Law in the negotiation process of collective employment contracts. Whether or not unions are effective however, will depend on how independent they are from management control.

V. Staffing Firms

The LCL devotes an entire section to staffing firms and formally codifies “tri-party” employment relationships. Although staffing firms fulfil the obligations of employers with respect to employment contracts, companies should be aware that they will be held jointly and severally liable (between RMB 1,000 and RMB 5000 per employee) for serious LCL violations of seconded employees. Because of this employers may not evade their responsibilities owed to employees.



ü Note: employers are prohibited from establishing staffing firms to second employees to themselves.
ü Note: staffing firms may not hire part-time employees for placement purposes.
ü Note: these rules are also relevant to “representative offices” of foreign companies in China which hire their employees through staffing agencies.

VI. Conflict of Laws
Generally speaking with respect to employment contracts, the LCL takes precedence over all the other employment related laws - although those labour contracts signed before 2008 are still subject to the Labour Law. However, if another employment related law that was enacted before the LCL is more specific on a particular subject and the LCL does not cover such subject, its relevant clause(s) will take precedence over the LCL.



[1] These funds generally do not apply to expatriate employees because of local bureaucratic issues with regard to implementation of such funds. For expatriates, these types of insurances are generally arranged through private insurance agencies rather than through State mandated funds.



[2] New Years Day (January 1st); Spring Festival (3 days); Women’s Day (Half day March 8th for women); Quingming Festival (April 5th); May Day (May 1st); Dragon Boat Festival (1 day); Mid-autumn Festival (1 day); National Day (3 days). Note: to accommodate these holidays, employers may require workers to work weekends preceding or after such holidays.







**(this is not legal advice!)

Wednesday, March 4, 2009

Drug Price Reform in China: How Exactly Will Consumer Prices Go Down?


In China, on average, approximately 50% of healthcare expenditures by individuals are made on pharmaceuticals. The pharmaceutical industry is one of the principal industries in China with an average annual growth rate of 16.72% per year. China has steadily gained international market share afforded by its low cost manufacturing and is already the world’s leading producer of active ingredients used in brand name and generic drugs. Cost savings with respect to medical and clinical trials, human capital, and use of existing research facilities have long been attracting foreign investments in Chinese R&D centres, distribution channels and manufactories. However, such savings have not been readily passed on to Chinese consumers. In China, insufficient funding has caused hospitals to aggressively seek revenue through pharmaceutical sales which has led to the present state of over prescribing and over priced pharmaceuticals along with the undermining of public health.

On October 14th 2008, the State Food and Drug Administration (“SFDA”) released the anticipated proposal on the health care reform plan for public review[1] (“Proposal”). One of the most ambitious propositions in the Proposal centres on drug pricing reform.
[1] Draft Proposal available at: shs.ndrc.gov.cn/yg (public review forum will close on November 14th 2008).

I. How are Drugs Priced in China?
In China pharmaceutical prices are either determined by market forces, or otherwise by statutory guidelines which are included in the following laws:

§ Drug Administration Law and its Implementation Rules (2004) (Chapter VII);

If drug prices are fixed or guided by the government, the price should reflect, among others, the principals in the Pricing Law of the PRC, and the average social cost, affordability, supply and demand, to ensure that prices are commensurate with quality, so as to protect the legitimate interests of consumers.

§ National Development and Reform Commission (“NDRC”), “Measures on Government Pricing of Pharmaceuticals” (2000), and SDRC “Implementing Rules on the Law of Pharmaceutical Administration (August, 2002);

For Class A drugs, the SDRC will set the maximum retail prices; while wholesale prices may be determined by the market. For Class B drugs, the SDRC will set maximum price guidelines for provincial level governments. In-house drug prices are based on manufacturing costs plus 5% in profits. See pricing mechanisms for non-listed drugs below.

§ Pricing Law of the PRC (May 1, 1998 ); and

§ PRC Law on the Administration of Drugs (December 1, 2001).

Consumers Suffer Due to Mark-ups Along the Distribution Chain.
The Chinese drug distribution sector is at best highly fragmented. The three tiered distribution chain starts with the manufacturer, then: (i) national distributors (e.g. located in Beijing, Shanghai, Guangzhou, Tianjin, Shenyang), (ii) provincial distributors, and (iii) county and city wholesalers (and occasionally at the bottom of the chain hard to reach retail stores). The end users are either hospitals or franchised retail drug stores, with hospitals being the main market accounting for 80% of drug sales.

Drug prices which according to law may be determined by the market are based on manufacturing and operating costs which are self-reported by manufacturers. Drug manufacturers have incentive to mark-up their operating costs to increase their margins - also directly affecting the margins of the entire distribution chain. The government capped mark-up is set at 15%. However in practice, retail prices illegally extend well over the statutory margin. The NDRC has reported that hospitals collect the largest percentage of the final price for a bottle of pharmaceuticals (as sold to patients) at 45-50% (with 30% representing their mark-up), further up the chain the distributors collect an additional 20-25% and manufacturers on average collect 30% of the final sale price. About 20% is lost to illegal mechanisms that encourage doctors and hospitals to prescribe drugs. What remains are unaffordable prices and pushed sales on unwitting consumers.

What is the Real Root of the Pricing Problems?
Authorities have attempted to cure the issue of overpriced drugs by exercise of 24 nationwide price cuts from 2001 to 2007. The centralized tendering drug procurement policy of 1999 was another attempt to overcome corruption and excessive drug prices. Although these measures reduce the wholesale prices of drugs they still do not address the core of the retail pricing problems which are connected to several factors including lack of fiscal subsidies for hospitals which rely on pharmaceutical sales as their major source of revenue, and underpaid doctors who by way of medical expertise retain a monopoly over the choice of drugs available to patients. Adding to the over-pricing problem are mark-ups from companies with unachievable economies of scale due to outdated technology and the chaos in the distribution system.

II. The Future of Drug Pricing in China
The Proposal pledges to set up a healthcare system by 2020 that provides all urban and rural residents “safe, effective, convenient, and affordable” healthcare.

Management of Medical Institutions
The drafters recognize that high retail drug prices are connected to the funding issues faced by doctors and hospitals and recommends improvement of wages and to separate the management function of hospitals from treatment and expenditure of drugs. In a further attempt to alleviate hospitals’ reliance on drug sales for revenues, the Proposal mentions amending service fees, which translates to a price hike for hospital visits and in-patient services. The authorities wish to reintroduce similar subsidies for medical institutions as were used pre 1980 when the government paid for everyone’s healthcare - how exactly this will be implemented is not specified. For the public, the Proposal speaks of an establishment of a personnel system to improve the quality of medical services, and a system that strictly defines the appropriate use of technology, workforce, and pharmaceuticals. The Proposal further outlines standardized drug and medical checks, but again still vague on the points. The issues that remain here are the regression of medical diagnostics and the simple fact of unenforceability. Hospital visits will generate more revenue and doctors will be paid more, but will this be enough to curb the retail prices of pharmaceuticals?

Essential Medicines
Essential drugs are those that “satisfy the priority healthcare needs of the population; they are intended to be available within the context of functioning health systems at all times in adequate amounts, in appropriate dosage forms, with assured quality….and at an affordable price.”[1]

Under the Proposal China would like to create a national system of essential drugs and aspires to, by 2010, provide access to affordable and safe drugs to 80% of the population. This system will establish a catalogue of necessary drugs to be produced and distributed under government supervision with the aim to make the most basic and indispensable medicines such as penicillin safe and available in the market. For essential drugs, the government wishes to take macro-control of the existing distribution system and use a centralized purchasing system.

Furthermore in an effort to increase price transparency; the Proposal makes a bold proposition to subject essential drugs to new labelling requirements of printing drug prices conspicuously on the outer packaging. This labelling requirement aims to curtail industry wide margins and will most certainly transform the distribution systems and may possibly cut out the smaller middlemen.

Conclusion
The Proposal closed for comment on November 14th. Several white papers on this topic will be released by experts early next year. At present the wording of the Proposal is too general to leave a particularly impressive forecast although it appears the focus is on essential drugs. Authorities have responded that the Proposal is merely a guideline and will be followed by a formal legislation and at least eight implementing rules. Overall the public is most concerned whether the limited funding will actually be used where it is needed the most.
[1] as defined by the World Health Organization.

** this article can be contributed to http://www.knowledgeatwharton.com.cn/ "Will Drug Price Reform Improve China's Health Care System, or Only Mask Symptoms"